An ad bar may go here)
:: Archive ::

>
July 2005  
>August 2005  
>September 2005  
>October 2005  
>November 2005  
>December 2005  
>January 2006  
>February 2006  
>March 2006  
>May 2006  
>June 2006  
>July 2006  
>September 2006  
>February 2007  
>March 2007  
>April 2007  
>May 2007  
>June 2007  
>July 2007  
>August 2007  
>September 2007  
>October 2007  
>November 2007  
>December 2007  
>January 2008  
>February 2008  
>March 2008  
>April 2008  
>May 2008  
>June 2008  

killing for peace is like...

...fucking for chastity




Wednesday, September 26, 2007

~* gaffer *~

spent $49 on a new hood for my beloved lens. sold e one which came wif my lens last week at $40. think $9 more for sthg useful is reasonable.

wats e problem wif e original hood? well, e 17-40 was designed for film/ff dslr. 17mm is very wide (104deg angle of view). so e hood needs to b wide n shallow. however when used on a 20d, e focal length is multiplied by 1.6 makin it 27mm (75deg angle of view). so e hood becomes useless. i need sthg deeper.

e new hood is meant for e 17-55 which is a new lens meant for aps-c dslrs. fortunately enuf, e widest angle of view n e filter size r e same as mine. yay.


hood comparison
f/2, 1/50s, iso800, 50mm


wanted to try to gaffer up my new hood to protect it from scratches. got some gaffer tape from patrick. not an easy thing to do. spent like 1hour. cos e tape is made from cloth so it's not easy to cut. but den pat said that i need to replace e gaffer every 6months to prevent it from leavin adhesive residue. -_-'" dun think i'm gonna do it again.


e end result is quite satisfyin
f/2, 1/90s, iso800, 50mm


e new hood makes my camera look bigger n meaner. haha.
f/2.8, 1/8s, iso500, 3.8mm

----------------
Now playing: James Blunt - 1973
via FoxyTunes










{Get back up there}